Meteoric rise, meteoritic fall

I usually stick to writing about editing and publishing here and comment about language usage elsewhere, but I’ve recently noticed a lot of people pondering the seemingly contradictory phrase “meteoric rise”:

So rarely do I get the chance to combine my language pedantry with my knowledge-of-astronomy-from-my-physics-days pedantry that I had to jump on this opportunity to assail you with a double dose of tedious über-pedantry. Ready? Here we go!

The phrase is pretty old

Google’s Ngram Viewer shows that “meteoric rise” grew steadily in popularity over the twentieth century, and its pervasiveness today probably makes it seem like a recent coinage.

But a description of a rise as meteoric first appears in the Google Books corpus in 1853, meaning it was probably in use for a while before then:

But that happy, though somewhat meteoric, rise of a new science from the shaken ashes of the old mystery was not long of beginning; for, in the midst of all the gathering and crowding details, wrought out by the post-alchemical craftsmen, a true chemical principle began to gleam.

(From The Northern British Review, 1853)

At that point meteoric was still used to refer to atmospheric phenomena in general—the same reason we refer to studies of weather as meteorology. It’s basically equivalent to “stratospheric rise,” a phrase that doesn’t seem to rankle careful writers and editors as much.

Even earlier, Elizabethan writers, including Charles Fitzgeoffrey and William Shakespeare, used meteor as a metaphor for a transiently brilliant person who appeared suddenly. That’s because…

A meteor is the streak of light, not the rock

A meteoroid is a space rock (think asteroid, but smaller). A meteor is the streak of light that a meteoroid produces when it burns up in our atmosphere. The meteoroids responsible for most of our meteors are the debris—like muddy footprints—left behind by comets as they orbit the sun. When the earth passes through that debris, the rocks that enter our atmosphere give us a light show in the form of a meteor shower. And if any part of a meteoroid survives the trip and lands on earth, it becomes a meteorite.

Meteors seem to appear out of nowhere and dazzle us with brilliance, although they can be short-lived, so most references to a person’s meteoric rise are apt, especially if their sudden popularity was unexpected. All this is to say, don’t avoid using “meteoric rise” because it seems contradictory. In fact, the phrase makes perfect sense. But do avoid using it because it’s long become hackneyed and stale.

2 thoughts on “Meteoric rise, meteoritic fall”

  1. What a dog shit article this was. Don’t fucking say it because it’s trite, who cares about the faux-astronomy

  2. The saying still doesn’t make sense. A meteor is the result of a meteroid that is FALLING through a planets atmosphere. Therefore the meteor would not exist without the descent of the meteroid making the phrase “meteoric RISE” incorrect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *